• Insekticus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    45 minutes ago

    This is the end-point of capitalism: the ultra-wealthy just allowed to run these organizations and only pay an utterly negligible fee for their transgressions.

    It’s going to keep happening and more and more often, because the oligarchs have finally completely taken over the global political theatre. Without a global revolution from the workers, we will end up going backwards and undoing everything.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      34 minutes ago

      This kind of slop for research has been passed around for decades. In the 1990s I read a “corporate intelligence report” on a company I was working for, it was 90% incorrect and 40% far far off target. Over the years I had several occasions to read and check these kinds of business research reports and they’d rarely even get the things that were published in the quarterly reports right, anything beyond that kind of public information was a lot of speculation, most of it wrong.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    51 minutes ago

    Strategic Investigations and multi site analysis, cross referenced with some other made up shit, reveals that this was statistically unlikely.

  • ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    5 hours ago

    At this point it isn’t AI slop, it’s got to be major Fraud by PWC. They were paid for in depth meticulous analyses, and instead, they just asked their drunk uncle AI, who claims to know everything, but really just has the knack to BS a halfway believeable answer.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      33 minutes ago

      To be fair, AI slop is probably higher quality information than the “in depth meticulous analyses” these kind of clowns have been peddling for thousands of dollars for the past 40+ years.

      • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 hours ago

        inertia, and management globally being unable to make a decision on its own, and wanting to outsource it.

        • cavitationfetishist01@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          You’re not wrong, but j feel like people have been so slipped up by a century of neoliberalism and education cuts, 20 years of social media, and five years of chatgpt+wsb/bettingmarkets, that there’s no solution left to anything but violence. I hate that shit.

          Some of these problems could be solved other ways,but they require much more sophisticated coordination and the capitalists have just digested it out.

          • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The reality is no one person is qualified to “run” a multinational megacorp. Not a single human being knows enough for this level of complexity, but the only reason any of them can justify the ungodly amount of marginal return they take is to pretend they’re super-geniuses while relying on ‘consultant’ teams to do the actual thinking, and also keep it quiet that they’re no more competent than the janitor they’re making 1000x the salary of (all in stock options of course, but 1000x nonetheless).

            All of this would work better if the “bosses” could accept they aren’t demigods, that the domain expertise to make collective decisions is within their existing org charts and they just need to step down off their high horses and remember they are just a cog in a much bigger machine that makes its own decisions with or without their input. They’re self-important sales reps, with just enough of a grasp of finance to be dangerous to themselves and others. I’m sure me and my 10 closest colleagues would also be inclined to say we do a billion $ of work every day if we were writing our own bonus agreements. We just wouldn’t have the hubris to convince ourselves it’s true.

            • MangoCats@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              30 minutes ago

              The reality is no one person is qualified to “run” a multinational megacorp. Not a single human being knows enough for this level of complexity

              This was true of the United States of America in 1789, but still you need a leader. A leader like Buzz Lightyear, he’s “always sure.” Confidently pursuing a plausible, coherent path has value, even when it’s not the optimal path - difficult to see, the future is, always in motion - direction by committee of “the best people” has its place, but so does decisive leadership.

  • Arancello@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    not at all surprised. another of the big four got caught in australia and had to refund fees charged.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 minutes ago

      Cry me a river. These kinds of “business intelligence” reports have been overpriced, near zero value slop since they started publishing them (a long long time ago.)