WTF!?

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    So basically, nuclear-armed planes and new warheads. That’s good. It was almost all on the French before. I wonder if Canada could sign on to collaborate and host UK nukes.

    The F-35 thing is questionable, but lots of non-US countries depend on them and manufacture the parts (and they’re great planes). In the long run I wonder if a custom ROM for the things might be in the cards, in defiance of the current agreements.

  • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Good to know Lockheed Martin has the same strangle hold on the UK as the US. You guys might want to fix that before Nigel or Boris make themselves king or supreme chancellor.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Considering how well the F35 did against Iran, I expect more F35 purchases from Europe going forward. I’m not aware of any European jets with comparable stealth and radar capabilities.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        There’s no equivalent jet in general. And for good reason - the requirements were insane and the development process was both massively slow and unfathomably expensive.

        In the long run, you have to wonder if sensors will move to any number of alternatives to radar reflections, but word is that stealth is still pretty (war)game-breaking ATM.

        It’s just that the US has privileged access to all the software…

      • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        43 minutes ago

        Didn’t Israel lose one? And this further sinks you into a position of reliance on empire America. Like who are you going to fight with these? Iran?

        OK I thought just the photos were AI. Looks like they’ve yet to loose one.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          No, it was all over .ml that they had, but that was misinformation. It was telling that it was all Iranian-sounding news agencies that were being posted.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Unless Israel has giant pilots to go alongside their space lasers, none have been shot down, to my knowledge. I’ve seen footage of some of their unmanned drones being taken out, so you may be conflating the two?

          Oh, and Europe is pretty much solely worried about Russia. They want systems that can suppress Russian air defenses. Iran operates (or at least, they used to) Russian air defense systems such as S-300 and Tor M1 that it appears the F35 has handily dealt with.

      • Anonymaus@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        F35 are too expensive and if you buy american you dont support domestic weapon manufacturers

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          They have incredible value, actually. I’m not sure what cheaper system your thinking of, but none come anywhere close to it’s general capabilities.

          If you factor in the development process it might not be such a great deal. But, you’re not at this point.

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Sure, but those domestic manufacturers are going to need to work on developing actual stealth airframes if they want any business. That takes time that Europe isn’t currently comfortable with at the moment

          • Anonymaus@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Thats true, that right now eu doesn’t have its own stealth fighter, but I dont think a few dozens of f35 is gonna make that much of a difference, I think we need more of cheaper planes that are easily replaceable

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I think we need more of cheaper planes that are easily replaceable

              Doesn’t Europe have a good number of airframes that fit that need? Rafales, Eurofighters, Gripens come to mind. F18’s too, but I recognize those aren’t domestic.

              I look at these F35’s as a the current best solution for SEAD and air dominance roles in a potential conflict. Once that’s taken care of these other less capable platforms could play their part.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    They just need to supports Trumps nobel peace prize and their journey to the dark side will be complete. Starmer will be allowed to come to the US and pick up the papers at Trumps feet every day from now on.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It was a bit odd that they were going to use the B varient even for their land-based fleet.

    • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I think the advantage there is they don’t need a full airfield to operate from, but if the UK has lost all it’s airfields, somebody’s getting nuked.

      • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Unless the US is the enemy and just disables the UK’s fighters, stops maintenance and support, etc.

        • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          58 seconds ago

          The F35 is a global product, with quite a few countries involved in manufacturing. I do think Europe and the UK could keep them flying without the US.

          Hell, Iran kept their F14s going for many decades without US support.

  • realitista@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Good to see UK step up in this regard, Europe needs to bolster its own nuclear deterrent independent of the USA as the USA is no longer a trustable partner.

    • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah bolster your military with a jet fighter that requires updates from a single source controlled by another country. I’m sure there will never be a problem with that arrangement

    • Humanius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I’m not sure if buying American equipment is a good way to rid ourselves of our dependence on America.
      It allows America to control our supply of spare parts and software updates, and it doesn’t bolster the European defence industry.

      • remon@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        A lot of the F-35 parts are produced in Europe, it’s mostly the software that is a concern. But it’s not like there are any alternatives right now. Developing a new European plane will take decades.

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            As I said, there are some concerns, but no, there is no out-right “kill switch” or any remote control capability.

            Really the biggest risk is the US withholding future software updates for a while, forcing operators to implement their own software packages for those the US will no longer provide updates for.

      • realitista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Obviously having an EU alternative to the F35 would be ideal, but it will take a long time and a lot of money to develop. For now there isn’t another option.

          • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Probably not, although Russia keeps jerking off to fan fiction about nuking a tidal wave across the island.

        • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          “According to the October 2024 report from the NNSA, it has also been certified to fly on the B-2, F-16, and German Air Force PA-200 Tornado jets, and is working towards certification on the Italian Air Force’s Tornados and the US Air Force’s B-21 bomber.”

          Meaning the German PA-200 the UK just retired in 2019 could have been certified to carry those warheads… But you probably would rather have warheads not made in America either

          • remon@ani.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            The airframes are at the end of their life, Germany is getting F-35s specifically to replace the ageing Tornados as well.

    • FishFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Never mind the American planes… these planes if nuclear-armed will be armed with American-owned bombs that will require American authorisation to arm.

      • realitista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        As opposed to what alternative? Do you have a European 5th generation stealth fighter bomber in your pocket that you’ve been keeping secret?

        • OrteilGenou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          That’s the spirit! Lock in to a multi-billion dollar contract for jets that are still largely delayed for delivery under other contracts because “what other choice do we have?”

          At least the F35 makes sense for Europe given its range, but having one option and one option only is a massive problem. Europe/UK should really develop their own, instead of creating a deadline for no reason and compromising to meet that artificial deadline. If an enemy finds a flaw in the F35 and everyone is overcommitted to the F35 then what, we all shit the bed and hope our new overlords are merciful?

          • realitista@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I think this will happen eventually, but we have immediate threats which need to be countered with what’s available today, we can’t wait 20 years to do something about them.

      • realitista@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        That’s never been verified and pretty much every European defense expert has stated that it’s not the case.

        • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Has anyone actually said it’s impossible? We’re talking about 8 million lines of absolutely proprietary code; it’s not.

          The US has not advertised any such capability, though.

          • realitista@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Well yes proving a negative is usually not possible. In this case maybe it is but it would be such exhaustive work that no one would probably trust the result anyway.

            • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Yep. And the US has every incentive and opportunity to include some such thing. Up until now, allied nations have just assumed scenarios where they’d use it against us were impossible.