• SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 minutes ago

    People will stop tearing down cameras, and in exchange, flock will do it themselves. Sounds like a solid compromise to me.

  • Wren@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    No kidding. Their proposed safety features to stop police stalking make the police accountable to themselves. Oh, and the police can shut off some of those safety features, and again, it’s up to the police to catch them.

    The world is one big kangaroo court and we gave all the children guns.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Flock Safety faces a growing public outcry over concerns that its surveillance technology could be misused has already been repeatedly and predictably misused.

    FIFY

  • Dryad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Amazing how since the beginning of policing, officers have managed to do their work without these cameras. Maybe they should just do that for the safety part and flock should just stop existing as a company for the privacy part.