• ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, we also have a lot of “papers please” in real life that no one has an issue with and actually serves a useful purpose. So the idea of extending this to the internet is logical and not necessarily a bad thing. It can actually provide something good. HOWEVER implemention is absolute key here, because it’s easy to over reach and collect (and store) way more tha! actually required for simple age verification. Since current tendency among politicians (in all nations) unfortunately leans heavily towards over reaching, as usual we can’t have proper things because the douchebags want to ruin it.

    • Brewchin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      You mean everyone, not just minors.

      It’s what this madness requires: everyone is a child until they can prove otherwise. To an age verification company that’s existed for 2 weeks and definitely isn’t lying or incompetent…

      And of course they do. Can’t risk a CEO crying wolf and it being real for once. Think of “the economy”.

      I hate this timeline. 😒

  • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Sadly I have little faith their proposal will be reasonable. It‘ll either be too soft or asking for unreasonable measures like broad identification and face IDs.

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Depends from country to country.

      Denmark for example have issued an age verification app, where no data other than “Allowed/Declined” is leaving the app.

      No specific age, no name, no data.

      The token is issued by the government.

      • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Does the app require iOS/Android and google play services, and is proprietary?

        Also gives the government data to track people, and presumably what source requested the token, so what the people are consuming. Denmark isn’t the worst country, but I wouldn’t trust any government with that

        Also it locks under 18s out of online communities that could help them and show them alternative perspectives to insular IRL bubbles that can often exist

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Germany’s app (AusweisApp2) is open source and available for literally every platform. Linux, FreeBSD and even Fdroid included.

          I’m not sure of the exact functionality and whether the government can track anything. You need to scan your ID, the app will then ask for a PIN (2fa) and then will tell you which data will be sent to whoever made the request.

          Authentication is done through an eID server which in theory anyone can set up. The requirement are quite strict though so right now there are only three providers. They check the validity of the ID and request and send the received ID data to the requestor.

          It’s quite the complicated procedure to ensure the highest possible security and privacy.

          The entire process is publicly documented and you can probably spend a few hours trying to understand it.

          As for locking people out of online communities: I don’t think it’s a problem if and only if the legislation applies exclusively to social media providers above a certain size. Such as having 5 million+ monthly users.

            • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Yeah, that’s an issue. Though that is also significantly less trustworthy since it only proves possession of an ID, not ownership. Afaik this method is therefore legally insufficient for platforms that need to know their customer (banks, stock exchanges etc.).

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It’s always interesting to me when I hear people who distrusts governments more than private companies.

          Maybe because I’m from Denmark, but it sounds so backwards.

          If I were from the US tho, I would think the same. Or like “i’m fucked regardless”

          • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I don’t trust governments that mandate the usage of private American services such as iOS/Google to access the internet

            • themurphy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              That’s a fair point.

              My argument only applied to the age verification in the Danish app, which doesnt share the ID to any server.

              The point is that you get a verification by logging in with another 2FA app, whos only job is to verify with the government server, that you are indeed a Danish citizen with official documentation.

              Then the other app recieves that token that only contains an age group with a true flag. This token is then shared with the private companies.

              As a stand alone solution to age verification that everyone needs to use, this is pretty well thought out.

              If a Linux phone then comes around that everyone would buy, you could do it better, yes.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I would rather see them ban all content with minors. Why do kids have to upload anything on the internet? Let platforms enforce it on their end.

  • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Like cigarettes, yeah it’s worse for kids but it’s not good for adults either. I’d rather see more restrictions placed in the companies making the toxic products than age verification based systems.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    About time Europe treated addictive feeds like the product design problem they are. The real test is whether this becomes meaningful age appropriate access with privacy preserving checks, or just another glorious cookie banner where everyone clicks »I’m 18« and TikTok solemnly salutes.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      EU already has systems for verifying age and the provider sends no identifiable information to the website. While I find age verification problematic and annoying - where credit is due, they seem to have at least made it so that the citizen data is not being uploaded to US servers.