• thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Hilarious

    “Give us all your code for free who cares about copyright anyway”

    “NOOOO YOU CANT USE OUR PRODUCT TO GET FRE CODE 😡😡😡”

  • Ostfriesentee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    I’m not sure making the tool you’re selling less useful is a smart idea. Hmm, yes liability is an issue. But other models are just gonna allow it anyway, so people will just stop using Claude for that usecase. Reverse engineering won’t stop. Claude will just not be used for it anymore

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      42 minutes ago

      I suspect we’ll see these features opened up for US-allied actors against their foreign competitors.

      You can guarantee US auto companies are going to be free to reverse engineer software and manufacturing techniques of Chinese companies, for instance.

      But you’re not going to be allowed to use Grok or Meta to hack your Tesla or BMW, pull out the OS, clone it as freeware, and offer a substitute unconstrained by subscription fees and gated upgrades.

  • jaykrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    This is another reason why I’ve reduced my dependency on AI considerably over the past few weeks, and I no longer personally pay for any AI tools/services at all.

    It’s insane to think someone would pay for something and after using it for a couple days they get told they can’t use it for certain things anymore.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    The restrictions are so they can gradually institute tiered access fees. This is how the industry becomes profitable.

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I once asked Claude to check the app it vibecoded for security flaws and it didn’t want to do it.

    It literally told me to look up some basic security principles and do it myself.

  • nerdo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It belongs in the trash. We’re going to look back on these large LLMs like we look at the milkman

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That’s a pretty significant part of the value and utility of AI…I bet stealing ppls ideas and getting to market first is still totally fine though, right?

  • anonymouspl@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    This is sick!
    They started with limiting cyber research capabilities, now gaming, within a month… what?
    Useless piece of shit. That’s why I use Mistral.
    Mistral, please do NOT go that way - I’d have to self-host my AI, and it ain’t cheap :))

    • magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Why not?

      God forbid we get our fucking hobbiest programming communities back.

      Everyone always says shit like “its okay if games use ai for programming just not art, its not like its something the player interacts directly with anyway.”

      Guess what? Programming is a fucking art form, and you literally interact with the code every keystroke.

      Code is an art asset, using an LLM to generate it is artistically bankrupt.