• toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    11 hours ago

    reminder: if you have anything saved with google, you should probably move it to somewhere that’s not tied to the US govt. mark my words: it’s just a matter of time before they weaponize Google.

  • huppakee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    12 hours ago

    In an unprecedented move, the Japan Fair Trade Commission on Tuesday issued a cease-and-desist order against Google for violating the country’s anti-monopoly law by forcing manufacturers to preinstall the company’s apps on their Android smartphones.

    This is the first time that Japan has issued such an order against any of the major U.S. technology companies referred to collectively as GAFAM — Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Yeah but the orange thumb isn’t known for rationality so joke aside, I wouldn’t put it past him to escalate.

  • aramova@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Not going to do much. If they actually wanted changes and not fines, they’d do something truly novel like order the manufactures to use GrapheneOS or some other actual open source OS that doesn’t depend on financing provided by the app stores and ads.

    Otherwise, you’re just making a show for the sake of showmanship, empty gestures.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      GrapheneOS

      The phone OS that only runs on Pixel devices. That’ll teach Google.

      • aramova@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        It works on some Samsung devices. The entire reason it doesn’t work on more devices is because the manufacturers don’t release the kernel source. Or did you miss that in the docs?

        Better question is, why would the courts not order the kernels to be open for open firmwares?

        “Let’s order a for-profit company to eliminate their profit method, and ignore the actual problem” is a specialty of ignorant courts… And commenters.

        So the courts, instead of addressing the real problem of phone makers only making hardware that for-profit partners can write software for, they just order the for-profit software makers to… remove the profit?

        The fuck kind of ass-backwards thinking is that?

        • turmacar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          The last supported Samsung device was the S4.

          Because ordering someone to develop something is more complicated and nuanced than saying what they’re currently doing is unacceptable and they need to do something else. Courts are a reactive body. Legislature is who would need to push for open kernels/hardware/firmware.

            • turmacar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              When watching the plumber work it’s unhelpful to complain that they aren’t fixing the electrical.

              If you want to be part of a team attempting vast sweeping changes with no oversight or nuance maybe DOGE is still hiring.

              Granted that’s not in Japan.