• VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    39 minutes ago

    Deserving to live and surviving are not the same. In the natural condition if you don’t gather or hunt, you have no food. You die. You do not deserve anything.

    Even in society you are not entitled to others working for you. However, in a civilised society we should provide for those incapable to provide for themself due to ethics.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I dont belong on this planet. That’s why I have to rent space until I mercifully pass away. Giving birth is child abuse and the most selfish act possible.

  • TheracAriane@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Well, l don’t earn a living since I don’t feel pressurised. But I ought to do something worthwhile just to feel that I am alive !!

    • JustVik@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The main thing is to remember what is worthwhile is not necessarily something that is imposed by mass culture, tv or the Internet.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You don’t deserve to be alive in this kingdom, but the catch is there is nowhere to live that is not owned.

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    No one deserves to be alive, except perhaps by virtue of being alive in that everyone deserves the converse: not to have life taken from them.

    You had millions of possible brothers and sisters who didn’t make it. You were just the lucky one.

    And, of course, earn a living means make enough to support yourself, and others if you choose. Nothing to do with what is inferred and also not something everyone can do.

      • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Society should care for and provide for people who really can’t work, as most civilised societies do.

        • procapra@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Who “really can’t work” in your opinion?

          I don’t work. Every few months I’ll really put in the effort and throw the applications in but nobody wants to hire me at this point. I’ll get demotivated and accept my couch surfing lifestyle again. The times I have had a job, they’ve not lasted long either.

          You ask my friends if I’m disabled and you’ll get mixed answers. I personally don’t see myself as such, but I am very defiant and not particularly skilled.

          Many people would say I’ve “chosen” to be unemployed (I don’t see it that way, but many people do)

          Do I deserve to have my needs met? Healthcare, food, water, shelter?

          • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I think a functioning state, not the US, would assign you some sort of work. I don’t know your exact situation, but it sounds like you’re capable enough. Based on what you’re saying in this one comment at least. I’m not going to pry for details, but it’s possible that something is preventing you from completing tasks. I think whatever it is can be worked around though. Should be able to find you some way of contributing at a pace you can handle.

            • Fossifoo [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Unfortunately I feel this is still a slippery slope and one that also even AES haven’t been very good at handling. Who decides what is “some way of contributing”? Is community work, emotional support, spreading knowledge about a hobby, some form of art a “valid” way to “earn one’s living”? And how much of those you would have to do? What happens if you are hindered? Who decides?

              I think without a post-scarcity (or severely degrowth) economy, these will stay hard to find a common ground on.

  • Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    12 hours ago

    You don’t deserve to be alive though, and it applies to everyone, even animals, if you don’t do the bare minimum you’ll die hot, cold, thirsty or hungry.

    • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yet I am to believe that Elon Musk deserves to be alive by a factor of several million times more than the people who grow my food?

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The anti-natalist folks and the pro-natalist folks are clearly in some kind of competition to produce the shittiest ideology imaginable.

      Congrats for putting points on your side of the board.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Good thing most of us don’t live like animals or think like you: we live in a society.

      Even in the US, at least some effort is made to not let the disabled who can’t care for themselves or financially support themselves die in the street. https://legalclarity.org/what-does-ward-of-the-state-mean-for-adults/

      The appointment of a state or public guardian is a measure of last resort, as courts prefer to appoint a family member whenever possible. State wardship occurs when the incapacitated adult has no spouse, willing family members, or a previously designated agent to take on the responsibility.

      • taygaloocat@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Fair enough to support disabled people or those who definitely can’t work by themselves.

        But if we’ve all got oars on a boat and some people just choose not to paddle then they can get off the boat. I bet there’s a lot more rich people and trust fund babies not paddling than there are lazy poor people though.

  • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It means by default you have to contribute to the society that you live in. And this is required in order for there to be a functional society to live in. It’s not an arbitrary rule, just a logical requirement.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not true in capitalism, capitalists don’t contribute but instead serve as elaborate parasites plundering the wealth created by the working classes.

      • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Capitalism is just a way to organize work. Yeah, it’s a plenty unfair one. But we are just using money as a means to trade work for food/products/shelter/services. It ends up driving the society - getting people to make society work, and to enjoy the benefits of it.

        • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Unless you’re one of the billions capitalism has decided it’s more profitable to slaughter, starve or plunge into a lifetime of poverty making t shirts and truck tires. Then you don’t get to enjoy shit.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Trade isn’t capitalism, though. Capitalism is a mode of production characterized by private ownership as the principle aspect of the economy. Capitalists essentially cast money out into the system, siphon the fruits of labor, and then repeat this process endlessly. Everyone does not enjoy the benefits of it, especially not those in the global south that are crushed by imperialism and unequal exchange.

          • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Capitalism is a form of trading. It is providing a service / lending resources, for a fee. It’s part of the notion that we use money to buy and sell anything and the economy works because everyone tries to make a buck and implicitly drive efficiency for society. It certainly has got out of whack now and needs some serious regulatory fixes. But for most people, they work to get money to buy what they need and as a result, they provide services, products, etc for others to buy what they need. It goes in a circle, and we end up helping each other. Yes, the rich siphon money off the top, but they don’t really affect the use or need of resources significantly. Their billions are just a number on a computer in a bank somewhere.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              No, you’re confusing trade itself for capitalism, and severely downplaying the immense siphoning of material wealth that goes on, especially at an international scale. Capitalists steal the value created by workers, workers are not on an even playing field with capitalists. They sell the only commodity they can, their labor power, while capitalists leverage their ownership of capital to fix labor prices around subsistence wages.

              Regulation can’t fix capitalism or save it from the tendency for the rate of profit to fall. We need to move onto socialism, where public ownership is the principle aspect of the economy and production and distribution are oriented towards satisfying needs rather than profits.

              • Tja@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                31 minutes ago

                The siphoning of material wealth occurs everywhere, including China, former Soviet union, Cuba, Venezuela, North Korea, etc. It’s not a capitalism thing, it’s a human thing.

            • davel@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              You‘re not even trying. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitalism

              Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their use for the purpose of obtaining profit. This socioeconomic system has developed historically through several stages and is defined by a number of basic constituent elements: private property, profit motive, capital accumulation, competitive markets, commodification, wage labor, and an emphasis on innovation and economic growth.