lemmy.net.au
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days ago

China develops iron battery 80 times cheaper than lithium that can last 16 years. It provides a budget-friendly, high-endurance answer for the world’s massive energy storage needs.

interestingengineering.com

external-link
message-square
21
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@slrpnk.net
  • technology@lemmy.ml
83
external-link

China develops iron battery 80 times cheaper than lithium that can last 16 years. It provides a budget-friendly, high-endurance answer for the world’s massive energy storage needs.

interestingengineering.com

☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · 2 days ago
message-square
21
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@slrpnk.net
  • technology@lemmy.ml
China's new iron battery hits 99.4 percent efficiency over 6000 cycles
interestingengineering.com
external-link
A research team at the Institute of Metal Research of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has advanced "all-iron" flow battery technology.
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • TrustedFeline [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    23 hours ago

    Makes sense when you think about what a lithium battery fire looks like compared to a thermite reaction. Get those iron oxides into a stable solution with electrodes and a salt bridge, and that’s your battery if you have reversible redox reactions for the iron oxides to do their thing

  • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    All these advances in energy technology make me envious of people who own a house like nothing else.

  • microfiche [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    anyone read that article?

    It has absolutely zero information in it. It’s a bunch of puffed up nothing. it’s a website called interesting engineering but there’s no engineering. it’s an article with zero technical information.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2095495622003485

      • varmint [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        This article says that the iron batteries cost is as low as $76.11 per kWh, but lithium ion prices are $108 per kWh right now. I have no idea how they got to 80x cheaper in that headline

        Edit: I think they’re just saying that the cost of raw iron is 80x cheaper than the cost of raw lithium by weight. That’s really deceptive

        • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 day ago

          Are they including the price over time if they last significantly longer than the lithium batteries?

          • chgxvjh [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            16 years, that’s similar to the expected lifetime of lithium solar batteries.

            • Jabril [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Yeah not a very good description then

      • microfiche [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why not post that

        • TrustedFeline [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It’s from 2022, so the OP article is about more recent developments I think.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 day ago

          because I looked it up after reading your comment and I don’t have the powers of precognition

          • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.netM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            I don’t have the powers of precognition

            your username rather specifically implies otherwise, yog

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              23 hours ago

              lmao touche

  • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    To put it simply: iron batteries are at a third of the density of lithium and is roughly the same price for housing installation per kWh as lithium. Idk what the other benefits of the medium are but if space or weight isn’t a concern iron could make sense. If the batteries have better effeciency in hot and cold I could see it out competing lithium household batteries in places like Canada or Russia. But shipping prices will likely be astronomical

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      I imagine having cheap batteries paired with stuff like solar for grid stability would be an obvious use case here.

      • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah there’s already some data centers and solar stations with these. This team made the longevity longer thus making them “cheaper”

        Currently I think vanadium flow batteries are the hottest rn

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          1 day ago

          it seems like there’s been a whole explosion of different battery tech in recent years, mostly coming from China

          • xijinpingist [none/use name]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            1 day ago

            I’ve been saying for decades if we only had advanced battery tech, oh the things we could do.
            I’ve had an electric scooter since I got to China and it’s great. Love the thing. Yes ti will run out of battery so you have to charge it. A battery is enough for a day’s use usually. No, you don’t drive to Tibet on a single charge.

          • kristina [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeah they clearly want to explore as many energy avenues as possible to avoid dependency on any one thing the west controls

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              23 hours ago

              And different types of batteries work best for different purposes too. If you’re making a vehicle then weight and size matters. If you’re building battery parks for grid stability then cost is a bigger concern. China is going to end up with a big toolbox which will allow for efficient solutions no matter the context.

  • tombruzzo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Man, solid state batteries when?

technology@hexbear.net

technology@hexbear.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@hexbear.net

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

  • Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
  • The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
  • Great libre software on Windows
  • Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!

Rules:

  • 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
  • 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
  • 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
  • 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
  • 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
  • 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
  • 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 380 users / day
  • 670 users / week
  • 671 users / month
  • 687 users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 24.3K subscribers
  • 237 Posts
  • 252 Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • context [fae/faer, fae/faer]@hexbear.net
  • SexUnderSocialism [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • gaycomputeruser [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • Wakmrow [he/him]@hexbear.net
  • SwitchyandWitchy [she/her]@hexbear.net
  • JustSo [she/her, any]@hexbear.net
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org