- cross-posted to:
- technology@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
Is it a good alternative?
Absolutely, especially given that a lot of it is based on open source technology such as RISCV. Similarly, China is releasing open models like DeepSeek while US companies are pursuing closed service approach.
Ah yes, let’s just ignore the authoritarianism and fascism because it’s open source :3
Edit: /s
Authoritarianism isn’t a fucking thing. And China isn’t fascist in any meaningful sense of the word. Why the fuck are you carrying water for the American Empire and siding against the country that every imperialist is currently salivating over destroying?
Pont exactly where I “carried water for the American Empire”
Your parroting of imperialist talking points and language.
So in order to not be carrying water for the U.S. I need to disagree with literally everything they say?
I’m not parroting. All words and opinions are mine.
I’m not parroting. All words and opinions are mine.
You are a product of very effective propaganda, so effective you think you came up with those ideas on your own.
“let’s just ignore the authoritarianism and fascism because it’s open source :3”
How is this not making the empires argument for them?
In contrast, I believe China is charting an alternative which I call “technomeritism”.
China is already technofeaudalist and is continuing to go down that path, so, you’re wrong. Its just more organized at doing it due to its authoritarianism
Look up its encroachment of the legal system with bias automators (usually incorrectly called AI) if you wanna argue that somehow China is better for freedom.
Thank you for taking your valuable time away from huffing gas to grace us with your deep and profound insights.
As a proud member of the gas huffing community we disavow that poster
