I mean it isn’t ideal, but getting stuck in inaction is probably still better than throwing water on it
I can’t get myself to not see the nose in the last panel as a little smile
The chaotic evil way to win this argument is to send the “water” person to prove it.
You might lose or badly maim a (soon-to-be-former) friend and burn your house down, but you’ll still win.
I know nobody here would, but if you put water on a grease fire, depending on how much oil there is, it will explode in a huge fireball.
This is because oil floats on water, so the water almost immediately sinks under the oil, but then, because of the heat stored in the oil, the water will also boil almost instantly. Because the water quickly turned into steam, it also expands quickly, which is an explosion, and all of that burning oil on top of the water will be flung in all directions.
That’s why you should never put water on a grease fire.
But it’s OK to pour grease on a water fire, right?
There have been cases where tap water was so polluted that it could be lit on fire, so it’s not quite as impossible as you probably think for there to be a “water fire”.
Ably demonstrated in the documentary The Simpsons.
Smothering works on more fires than water, go with that.
*Disagreasement
Reminds me of the saying
great minds think alike but idiots rarely differ
