• 0 Posts
  • 22 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 4th, 2024

help-circle



  • LandedGentry@lemmy.ziptoLeopards Ate My Face@lemmy.worldMAGAt loses his federal job
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Actually the burden of proof not necessarily always on the one who made the claim. But it is on the person who has the less credible claim.

    I don’t need to prove it’s false. I just need to demonstrate that, taken at face value, the more prudent thing to do is assume this post is at least partially made up. And given the details of it, the most likely scenario is that the story is not 100% true.




  • Despite your stance/tone I’ll answer this in good faith and assume you’re genuinely asking even if I think you’re not.

    The best lies/misinformation attempts are couched in 1) truths and/or 2) plausible things that can’t be dismissed as impossible.

    It is plausible [insert any JFK assassination conspiracy]. Should they all be equally weighted? Is each equally plausible? No, yet dozens persist because they’re at all plausible. I say this as someone who says the least plausible scenario was lone gunman who was killed by some rando. I think it was a conspiracy. But it doesn’t mean I treat each conspiracy theory as equally plausible. Unfortunately it’s hard to 100% disprove basically anything, so even the worst ideas remain sticky if people want them to be true.




  • LandedGentry@lemmy.ziptoLeopards Ate My Face@lemmy.worldMAGAt loses his federal job
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    I didn’t say it never happens. I’m saying most people don’t respond to layoffs by selling their home immediately. Trump hasn’t even been in office for 60 days. So this dude probably got laid off, assuming this happened, 4 to 6 weeks ago if we’re being generous.

    You’re also not taking into account current interest rate/home prices. If this person has held their home for a long time, then even if they got a higher interest from the 90’s or 2000’s The home was so cheap back then that their bill is probably pretty reasonable. If they’ve had it for a couple of years, then they got incredible interest rates And to give that up for a higher interest rate upwards of 7-8% would be asinine. Not to mention it would be very hard to finance when you admit you were laid off and don’t have a job. The most likely outcome is an equal or even higher mortgage payment unless they truly uproot their lives. Again, all over a recent layoff.

    The narrow lane of parameters for this story to be true makes it possible but highly unlikely. And the flag thing…come the fuck on.

    Plenty of people are having their lives ruined. Some random person on the Internet telling this story is what we’re going to point to?