They are making less off of AI overviews than traditional ads, but their AI buildout costs are increasing, which is ass backwards. I don’t know if it was in their report but they also supposedly don’t have a strategy for making their customers pay for AI use.
They revealed that they make less money on the AI Overview than traditional ads. Also they, supposedly, have no strategy to monetize AI use from their customers.
Genuinely asking: if I buy a game (aka “license to play”) on steam, is it morally ok to acquire the same on the high seas? I assume The devs got paid when I paid steam?
Halo
VIIIIIII
Who understands Roman numbering anyways
What a terrible headline! It isn’t misleading for clickbait, it’s just… inconsequential. The headline belies the main point of Broche’s thinking:
Rather than pleasing an imaginary audience, Broche reveals that development on Clair Obscur was focused on satisfying the developers.
Absolutely, thanks! I got this (crucial?) detail missed, that the two aren’t independent but AI overviews cannibalizing traditional ads both losing money.