• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    There’s a (possibly apocryphal) story about Zuckerberg originally being very resistant to turning Facebook into another Yahoo or MySpace or similar ad-swamped interface, on the grounds that it would scare people away and create a drag on growth. It even got a send-up in The Social Network movie.

    Whether this was an intentional business strategy or a second order effect, Facebook was originally one of the cleanest Web 2.0 sites. They did a genuinely pretty good job of focusing on media you were flagged as caring about and showing you activity of friends and family who you wanted to follow. More savvy early users even commented on how creepy Facebook could get, precisely because it could find your friends better than you could and bait you with interactions that drew people together.

    The modern iteration of the company is so far away from what it was originally designed to be. The Shrimp Jesus clickbait era Facebook might as well make it a different website. I cannot imagine anyone seeing this site coming into college Freshman year and finding anything that makes it appealing.

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, but there’s still this:

      Zuckerberg: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

      Zuckerberg: Just ask

      Zuckerberg: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

      [Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

      Zuckerberg: People just submitted it.

      Zuckerberg: I don’t know why.

      Zuckerberg: They “trust me”

      Zuckerberg: Dumb fucks

      Instant messages sent by Zuckerberg during Facebook’s early days, reported by Business Insider (May 13, 2010)