• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    The amazing digital circus might thank part of its popularity to the nostalgia of the kidcore aesthetic featured troughout the circus.

    The adult lead character pomni appears as a clown with little features that we would objectively associate with an adult wonen besides possessing the clear psychological maturity and intelligence of an adult.

    The features of pomni could be described as short stature, a bright childlike color scheme, and large eyes relative to the face, a physiological trait often associated with infancy in mammals.

    Now for science, is it pedophia to wank off to amazing digital circus porn of pomni and does it make a difference wether its a visual drawing or a text based work of fiction.

    My point is not to convince you of annythhing just that your argument itself easily falls apart once one has to define “childlike features” into a legal/moral setting.

    • Saapas@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      43 minutes ago

      I thought I had an aneurysm trying to parse the first paragraph. I am not going to google any of that

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        22 minutes ago

        It’s a genuine very good youtube series that is rivalling industrial production quality and popularity, i am just using it as a very twisted example. Dont let my description stop you from watching it. Adc characters are not in any way portrayed in a sexual nature, unless you count this.