• Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    So then if I consent to someone fucking my corpse after I’m gone, it becomes morally OK for them to do it.

    • 87Six@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Well yea I guess if I go tell shawty she can ride my hog after I get the death erection and she does it I can’t really be mad at her can I

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      With regard to the corpse, maybe.

      There’s possibly a virtue ethics argument against the person doing it? Like, it’s a little weird that they want to, right?

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Weird from a cultural perspective where any sort of non-medical interference with a corpse is frowned upon, so we’re trained from a very young age to find any of that stuff icky/morbid. Other cultures may not have that same aversion.

        Kinda in the same vein as we in North America have a very conservative opinion on being naked in public where other cultures couldn’t care less.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          I’m already a moral relativist.

          What I’m asking is if a person who wants to and does have sex with corpses, knowing that this is socially profane and must be kept secret, is this a trustable person?

          Also, respect for the dead often involves rituals that are non-medical. I think disease obviously played a part in how these rituals were formed, but I don’t think that disease is the primary reason people care.