• TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Ah, yes, the fact that prehistoric Fuegians may have visited the Falklands surely means they’re the birthright of Argentina. Airtight anti-colonialist explanation.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Literally no one was there when France landed there, so you can either a) ask France and Spain for their thoughts, b) resurrect the Fuegians who visited and let them have it, forcibly deporting the people who’ve lived there for centuries, or c) disregard pragmatism and say they aren’t part of any country – either way, you can stop obnoxiously trying to defend Argentina’s baseless colonialist claim under the guise of “anticolonialism”.

        To the extent it belongs to anyone, it obviously belongs to the UK far more than it does to the asshurt losers who flaccidly tried and utterly failed to assert sovereignty over it.

        • VoteNixon2016@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          6 hours ago

          it obviously belongs to the UK far more

          No land “belongs” to anyone, least of all to the asshurt losers who flaccidly tried and utterly failed to keep their empire alive

          • PennyRoyal@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            So if no land belongs to anyone, the only people who’s opinion should count are the people actually fucking living there, no? Who want, pretty much universally, to remain under uk rule. Who owns the bit of rock is far less important than the thoughts of the population that live there. And they think “fuck off argentina”