not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agoso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1166arrow-down14
arrow-up1162arrow-down1imageso much winninglemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 days agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·7 days agoIt is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale. A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
minus-squarenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-27 days agoit went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
minus-squareGladaed@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·7 days agoThat’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.
It is not jumpy. It being close to zero can be fixed on your end by choosing proper y scale.
A sudden change in value is different to a trend.
it went from .0008 to .0006 which is 25% down, its a logarithmic graph, if it keeps losing at a steady rate , you cant just zoom out and say it looks steady because of that
That’s much less loss of value than 10 years ago. I didn’t say that.