• arrow74@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Fron my understanding the bulk of their sovereign wealth fund comes from socializing the profits of resource extraction within Norway. Minerals and fossil fuels primarily, not corporate taxes. Although those exist.

    Taking a global view to the issue is not something I thought about. Admittedly I was taking a view country by country that focused on how the state is impacting the individual citizens within their borders.

    I’ll have to think more on this one. Evaluating whether or not a country is authoritarian towards its own people is useful for looking for places to migrate to or systems to replicate (at least in the short term), but it doesn’t consider the greater suffering caused by those systems outside of borders.

    All very good points from you

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      No problem! This analysis of imperialism is the biggest distinction between Marxists and social democrats. Lenin played an enormously valuable role in identifying this process before the modern welfare state, and the concentration of capital accelerated this export of exploitation. Italian philosopher Domenico Losurdo talked about “Herrenvolk Democracy,” how the in-group recieved the bulk of progressive change at the same time the out-group received brutal exploitation in similar degrees.