ickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 hours agoPervert cancerlemmy.worldimagemessage-square63fedilinkarrow-up1198arrow-down11
arrow-up1197arrow-down1imagePervert cancerlemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 hours agomessage-square63fedilink
minus-squareAscendantSquid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·7 hours agoIt’s not the point at all, but can dogs be poor? Like, their human can be poor, but does that then apply to the dog too? Applying a financial status to a dog feels weird, it’s not like it can open a bank account.
minus-squareTm12@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoMaybe dogs can’t be wealthy, but some eat/live really well.
minus-squaresp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 hours agoI mean strictly speaking, yes, it is odd to describe a dog directly with human socioeconomic descriptors. But yeah, I meant it as ‘the dog is owned by a poor human’.
It’s not the point at all, but can dogs be poor? Like, their human can be poor, but does that then apply to the dog too? Applying a financial status to a dog feels weird, it’s not like it can open a bank account.
Maybe dogs can’t be wealthy, but some eat/live really well.
I mean strictly speaking, yes, it is odd to describe a dog directly with human socioeconomic descriptors.
But yeah, I meant it as ‘the dog is owned by a poor human’.