• banazir@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    48 minutes ago

    You sweet summer child, back in my day YouTube had a five star rating system and video response functionality.

    • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      Gotta say, don’t miss video responses. It was nearly all irrelevant content and people trying to advertise their own channels

      • banazir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 minutes ago

        Perfectly true. It would’ve been nice, if it wasn’t so inherently abusable. We can’t have nice things.

    • sasquash@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      3 hours ago

      and search results showed only videos related to your search. recommendations on the side were similar videos and not some unrelated bullshit. it was so much better.

      • cannedtuna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Honestly if someone remade an old YouTube alternative I think it would take off.

        It’s what I wish PeerTube was, but I’m not sure if that will ever take off sadly.

        Lack of advertising dollars is definitely an impediment to video platform alternatives…

        I remember a time when people just posted silly little shitty drawn videos just for the fun of it. Not saying creators shouldn’t be compensated for their hard work, I just feel like something was lost with the monetization of every little thing.

        • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Which I really hate, because it means when you get into some specific interest, YouTube basically stops showing you anything else.

          Hey YouTube! Those interests I was into last week, last month, I’m still into them! Please don’t railroad me like that!

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      And the video’s rating was plainly visible so you could use it to make the decision whether the video was even worth your click.

      The shovelware AI slop video channels wouldn’t be such a problem today if we still had that.

      • cRazi_man@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Going straight to YouTube is like going straight to Imgur looking for good content. Should never be done. Places like Lemmy or friend chat groups refer me to good videos. Or my curated subscribed channels with quality content is the other way I watch youtube.

        Anyone going straight to YouTube.com looking for their algorithm and ratings system to tell them about shit content in advance is mistaken in their expectations.

        • alpine_jim@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          extensive use of the “Don’t recommend this video > Tell us why > I don’t like this video” function, plus removing bad videos from my watch history after I stop watching, has got me a well-trained slop-free recommendations page with interesting new smallish channels.

        • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Usually I go there looking for something specific and use the search bar.

          However, the search function in YouTube has also turned to absolute crap. It only lists a few results and then switches to random shit you didn’t ask for.

          A lot of the results are also often misleading titles leading to lazy videos that are a slideshow of impertinent pictures with a synthetized voice spewing inaccurate information. AI has made that even worse. The star rating system would have helped identify these crap videos before you click on them.

    • Zarobi@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Makes me wonder if under the hood it’s still stored as stars or if they migrated their data. Is a 3 star or more rating displayed as thumbs up now? Is a thumbs up just a 5 star rating? When thumbs down existed was that just 1 star?

  • Dookieman12@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    4 hours ago

    We’re all being punished because Google’s feelings got hurt when we didn’t like the 2018 YouTube Rewind enough. That was the end of the dislike button and the YouTube Rewind altogether.

  • Pudutr0n@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    back in my day, you posted about your life in your geocities website! And you wrote the html on notepad and had to include an animated gif that told people to email you, cause that was the style at the time.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I wrote HTML in EDIT, but my first webserver ran on an OpenVMS Alpha workstation.

    • eurodyne@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Eh, back when GeoCities was still a thing, most people were too busy actually having a life to regularly post about it online. Since this was before smartphones, updating a social media profile was a lot more complicated and time-consuming.

      Having an active social media profile back then was often a red flag that a person was more “talk” than “walk“.

    • DeLancre@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yes, but actually no.

      2 things:

      1. Dislike button itself not "wired’ to any visible/meaningful count and only seen by video author (which is funny, cause whole point of hiding dislike count was promoted as “beneficial to mental health of channel owners”)
      2. If you using youtube dislikes — it replaces that button with it’s own, counts presses on its own and uses own logic to show “approximate” amount of dislikes on video: it’s not like it knows real count, what I’m trying to say