• cRazi_man@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Going straight to YouTube is like going straight to Imgur looking for good content. Should never be done. Places like Lemmy or friend chat groups refer me to good videos. Or my curated subscribed channels with quality content is the other way I watch youtube.

    Anyone going straight to YouTube.com looking for their algorithm and ratings system to tell them about shit content in advance is mistaken in their expectations.

    • alpine_jim@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      extensive use of the “Don’t recommend this video > Tell us why > I don’t like this video” function, plus removing bad videos from my watch history after I stop watching, has got me a well-trained slop-free recommendations page with interesting new smallish channels.

      • feddylemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        25 minutes ago

        Yeah it can definitely be somewhat trained. Also the extention dearrow makes a big difference in the experience too.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Usually I go there looking for something specific and use the search bar.

      However, the search function in YouTube has also turned to absolute crap. It only lists a few results and then switches to random shit you didn’t ask for.

      A lot of the results are also often misleading titles leading to lazy videos that are a slideshow of impertinent pictures with a synthetized voice spewing inaccurate information. AI has made that even worse. The star rating system would have helped identify these crap videos before you click on them.