• Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You seem to have a titanic blindspot in the form of a fundamental unawareness about the stability of your indefinite access to the media you can stream. Research some of the modern conversion around owned media. The point is that we didn’t even have to think about it be we weren’t beholden to a company. Expandable storage capacity was already to the point where I had it all with me and I could listen in the middle of nowhere and again, was never even a thought otherwise.

    Dress it up however you’d like, it’s lesser in many ways.

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hey, not arguing anything you said; in fact, I agree with all of it.

      It’s just that there’s so much negativity in the world that I thought I’d point out the bright side of things.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It’s a nice thought, but in this case that can really read as covering for bad folks doing bad things. The old saying is to plant trees that you will never be able to enjoy the shade of - meaning trying to focus on our positive today “this works great for me now” does nothing for the kids that will come up after us. We focus on, not positive or negative, but on reality for them, today.

        And the reality is, the strategy is get us to full cloud, no owned media, and then make access gated to the wealthy, censor/alter content after release and monitor consumption of media for several nefarious reasons.

        It’s real and it’s active, speak about it.