Who’s afraid of Zohran Mamdani? The answer, it would seem, is the entire establishment. The 33-year-old democratic socialist and New York City mayoral candidate has surged in the polls in recent weeks, netting endorsements not just from progressive voices like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders but also his fellow candidates for the mayoralty, with Brad Lander and Michael Blake taking advantage of the ranked-choice voting system in the primary and cross-endorsing Mamdani’s campaign.

With the primary just around the corner, polls have Mamdani closing the gap on Andrew Cuomo, the disgraced former governor of New York. This has spooked the establishment, which is now doing everything it can to stop Mamdani’s rise.

Take Michael Bloomberg, who endorsed Cuomo earlier this month and followed this up with a $5m donation to a pro-Cuomo Pac. The largesse appears motivated not by admiration for Cuomo – during his mayoralty, sources told the New York Times that Bloomberg saw Cuomo as “the epitome of the self-interested, horse-trading political culture he has long stood against” – but animosity towards Mamdani and his policies.

Mamdani wants to increase taxes on residents earning more than $1m a year, increase corporate taxes and freeze rents: policies that aren’t exactly popular with the billionaire set.

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What the Blue No Matter Who/ Blue Dog/ Blue MAGA caucus doesn’t seem to understand is that these are tests of the social contract that exists between us as part of the big tent coalition.

    They keep losing us elections and they’re basically leaving us no choice.

    • John Richard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      “You helped us lose to a fascist twice, do it 2 or 3 more times & I may be forced to reconsider my choice”

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      What “social contract”? I don’t vote to punish or reward politicians, I vote whichever way is going to make life for me and other Americans suck less. Both popular options suck, but one sucks way more. No third party stands a chance until one of the main parties fractures, or we get RCV. My money’s on a Republican fracture personally, and the sooner they start losing the sooner that’ll happen.

      Blue No Matter Who is just shorthand for those facts. Once the alternative isn’t worse, it can be discarded as a strategy. It is a strategy, not a “social contract”.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The dipshits that got us here are the Republican party and the Heritage Foundation. Not to mention all the “leftists” who never show up to Democratic primaries but complain endlessly about the candidate, then go on to vote third party or not vote at all. Bad Democratic candidates are a symptom of the dipshits responsible.

          You’re the problem. I’m trying to do damage control to limit the scope of the problem. Did you have a proposed alternative vote that would have come closer to working out? Because not voting for one of the two major parties is counterproductive until one of them collapses. I don’t respect the electoral opinions of people who don’t understand elections.

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            I don’t support the electoral opinions who keep doing the same thing over and over again expecting change.

            Keep casting your votes for pathetic, loser, corporate democrats even though they don’t give a shit about you and even though they keep lying to you again and again.

            That’s what I just heard you say.

            But I would prefer we blame the shitty politicians instead of each other.

            Question: do you live in a red state or a red county or something?

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              I don’t support the electoral opinions who keep doing the same thing over and over again expecting change.

              Like voting third party, or not voting? That has the same result every time, why keep doing it?

              Keep casting your votes for pathetic, loser, corporate democrats even though they don’t give a shit about you and even though they keep lying to you again and again.

              The most perfect candidate in the world is totally worthless in an election they have no chance of winning, and worse than worthless when supporting them splits the votes which oppose fascism, allowing it to take hold.

              Lesser evil with a chance of winning is better than perfect with no chance, every single time.

              The longer you treat Democrats as traitorous allies, the longer it’ll take you to understand. They are not allies. I don’t vote for them because I agree with them, I vote for them because the only alternative with any chance of winning is worse.

              They are not your friends. They are temporarily useful enemies.

              But I would prefer we blame the shitty politicians instead of each other.

              And who nominated those shitty politicians in their primaries? We the people. If the politicians don’t represent your demographic, then there are exactly two explanations:

              1. Your demographic isn’t showing up to primaries
              2. Your demographic is showing up to primaries, but other demographics are more popular.

              Voting third party is stupid, not voting is stupid. Voting in primaries is smart, encouraging others to vote in primaries is smart, educating people so that more of the voters in primaries agree with you is smart. Do smart things, not stupid things.

              Question: do you live in a red state or a red county or something?

              I do. So do many others. Third party might be slightly less stupid in a safe blue state, but it’s mind-bogglingly stupid as a general strategy.

      • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The contract is that because we share a party we share control of that party and it’s direction.

        If that contract is breached, well we really don’t have a party.

        The cudgel of “it rubs the centrist on the skin or it gets the trump again” only works if centrism can win elections, and that’s entirely the fucking point: it can’t. And when centrists occupy some of the most progressive districts to them cross the fucking line and vote with Republicans, what exactly is the fucking point?

        Centrists do own the Democratic party, but if their business isn’t being responsible to the people in the big tent, they’ve violated the peace treaty the tent represents. If they’re going to demand that politics need to be done their way to win elections, they actually have to win elections. Otherwise there is no coalition worth having with having with them.

        Internal to the Democratic party is a social contract between factions, and one of the parties in that faction seems to think they can violate that contract with impunity.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Uh, I don’t share the Democratic party. Sure, I vote any time I can to direct them to suck a bit less, but it’s not because I think they represent me. The treaty is that whoever votes in their primaries decides who their candidate is. If you’re not voting in their primaries, you have no control.

          If the majority of the people really wanted a progressive candidate, they could get one by showing up in force to the primaries. Primary voting participation is like 15%, it would be easy to sweep that if people actually showed up. Get every leftist to show up to the primaries. If they still lose, that’s just democracy.

          Stop treating the DNC as a traitorous ally. They are not an ally. They are a tool used to effect future material conditions. The tent represents a collection of demographics with a common enemy that they pool their votes to defeat. Leaving the tent only makes that enemy harder to defeat.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            If the majority of the people really wanted a progressive candidate, they could get one by showing up in force to the primaries.

            The primaries that the party successfully argued in court that they don’t have to run honestly.

            The primaries they didn’t even bother to have last year.

            Get outta here with that “pRiMaRy” shit. Democrats don’t do trustworthy primaries.

          • gobbles_turkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Uh, I don’t share the Democratic party.

            You just got done saying you vote blue no matter who a few comments ago.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              Frequently, answers are found by reading the entirety of a passage.

              Stop treating the DNC as a traitorous ally. They are not an ally. They are a tool used to effect future material conditions.

      • gobbles_turkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        We dont have platforms any more so how can you “vote whichever way is going to make life for me and other Americans suck less”.

        And hows that working out for you?

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Well, Biden was better than Trump before him, so that was nice actually. Didn’t quite have enough this time, and now the military is deployed in blue cities. I’d say it could’ve sucked a lot less.

          Did you have a proposed alternative vote that would have come closer to working out?

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Did you have a proposed alternative vote that would have come closer to working out?

            That’s what honest primaries used to be for.