There have been multiple cases. And if you’re talking about the one with the little dog, they literally trespassed onto someone’s property, took the dog from their porch, then killed it before the owner could even find where the dog was taken.
The leadership is unethical and corrupt, they euthanize at a WAY higher rate than any other group dealing in animal rights and welfare, they frequently lie and misrepresent issues, etc etc.
All this shit is VERY easy to google and pretty well documented. So when I say that you are refusing, it’s because you couldn’t be fucked to type “Peta issues” into a google search. You came in with your mind made up, throwing around Peta propaganda claiming whitewash and expecting a spoonfed rebuttal. I think you are likely just looking for an argument.
Here’s one of many many articles out there that look critically at the bullshit of Peta. Peta is a shit organization, run by shitty people to dupe those with a tender heart towards animals. They are trash.
I will not. I’ve heard their spiel plenty, they aren’t trustworthy. You asked, I answered, and you gave a response like what I assumed you would because you don’t want to look at them critically. You fixate on a point here or there and assume that is absolution for all things or just want to pretend the rest doesn’t exist.
That “pet stealing” case is in the video and is blown out of proportion.
There have been multiple cases. And if you’re talking about the one with the little dog, they literally trespassed onto someone’s property, took the dog from their porch, then killed it before the owner could even find where the dog was taken.
THAT case is literally covered in the video and it is much more nuanced than it is presented in the media.
Oh well then by all means ignore all the rest of it.
Like what?
If you refuse to look anything up about them, or came here with your mind made up, I really don’t see how any reply will matter.
I am not refusing?! What is their big issue?
The leadership is unethical and corrupt, they euthanize at a WAY higher rate than any other group dealing in animal rights and welfare, they frequently lie and misrepresent issues, etc etc.
All this shit is VERY easy to google and pretty well documented. So when I say that you are refusing, it’s because you couldn’t be fucked to type “Peta issues” into a google search. You came in with your mind made up, throwing around Peta propaganda claiming whitewash and expecting a spoonfed rebuttal. I think you are likely just looking for an argument.
Here’s one of many many articles out there that look critically at the bullshit of Peta. Peta is a shit organization, run by shitty people to dupe those with a tender heart towards animals. They are trash.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190110130626/https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/03/petas-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-history-of-killing-animals/254130/
This is the entire point of the video I posted. Watch it.
I will not. I’ve heard their spiel plenty, they aren’t trustworthy. You asked, I answered, and you gave a response like what I assumed you would because you don’t want to look at them critically. You fixate on a point here or there and assume that is absolution for all things or just want to pretend the rest doesn’t exist.