Stupid ass incel bait. Y’all need to go back to SipsTea with this shit.
I don’t know how anyone has money for any of this stuff.
I’m opposed to AI, but trying to make me feel bad about “egirl” thirst traps is not the way.
Sorry, but I don’t really care about e-girls. I only care about i-ladies.
And this is why “tits or GTFO” was a rule of the internet. like the german general at the end of Indiana Jones and the last crusade… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4PLIaNUZuQ
It was a rule about the sacred anonymity of the internet. No one cares who you are until you make it known, and once you do people are going to form expectations.
I also hate AI GFs, and the AI zombies falling in love with them. But e-girls are no substitute for a real GF.
Also it’s on 4chan, so it could be fake.
Maybe perchance also gay?
Alright guys, I’ll say it this time, its clearly fake 'n gay
Clankers vs Egirls
🎶“1-800-cars-4-kids…”🎶
Electronic girls implies the existence of Magnetic girls, who are a function of the divergence of the E-girl field.
that also implies electeomagnetic girls
Well, some of them are very attractive.
Reminds me of the Tosh line: “being an ugly woman is like being a man – you’re gonna have to get a job.”
I think profiting of the loneliness of people is wrong no matter who does it
Why? E girls provide a service that is rare and valuable, and the people who pay them clearly prefer to pay them for this service rather than not recieving the service. So do you think the E girls should be made to provide their services for free, or do you want to deprive the people who pay them of assuaging their loneliness even a little?
Sure, you could say something about how if society were structured differently, no one would be lonely and everything would be sunshine and unicorn farts. But neither the E girls nor their customers can have any real impact on the whole shape of society.
Sure, but I think the soulless corp hoovering up the profits with faceless entities is more to blame here than the actual human giving their time to others.
The latter scenario is just someone trying to survive in this fucked up world. The former is the ones who did the fucking doing even more to fuck the world.
Crazy how you think that the customer is the exploited one in a sex work situation. Loneliness doesn’t excuse contributing to a situation where someone must sell such an intimate part of their humanity to have a good life.
I feel for the lonely person, too, but I don’t excuse their bad choice to engage in prostitution.
Nothing here says she did sex work though. She was paid to talk to men online as an egirl, probably OF or Patreon
Why is prostitution a “bad choice”? The first half of your comment leads the reader to believe you think sex workers are exploited but then slap them in the face. What do they have to excuse? People pay them for a service. Just as a cake decorator takes money from people making the bad choice to engage in marriage
I’m saying that the person buying is making a bad choice and is exploiting the sex worker.
I believe both parties are wrong ethnically. The sex worker for my aforementioned statement and the customer for paying for it.
Come on egirls. You have to change with the times. Maximise your potential. AI can’t sell used bath water and you can create an infinite supply.
Soon there will be AIgirls that sell cooling water from data centres.
They could pretend to be AIs, though that would be a despicable thing to do.
Ai’s aren’t out competing real people by means of quality here, they’re doing it by means of availability.
To compete with an AI you would need to be at their beck and call literally any second of the day, and for significantly less money and what she was doing before.
Time for a government bailout.
Sarah McLachlan music For just 50 cents a day you can sponsor an egirl in need…
Can we all agree eGirls are still better than AI?
Only in the sense that piss is better than shit
Piss is leagues ahead of shit
I’ve never paid someone to shit on my face
What’s the difference between a garbanzo bean and a chickpea?
I know this one. You would never have a garbanzo bean on you :D

If you’re from the US: it’s called taxes there…
bottom feeders need love too? heh











