… unless the person works voluntarily, that is.

  • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Nature compells us to work for food anyway, that’s not exploitation and coercion, that’s just survival.

    The construct of society is predicated on the idea of “from each… to each…” That saying often gets conflated with left-wing politics, but that’s just the point of animals (humans included) grouping together; after all, what’s the point of living in society if it doesn’t convey any benefits to the individual that they could not provide for themselves? That would be exploitative of the individual. But if they are benefitting, then it is only fair and just to also give back to the society one extracts benefits from, otherwise it is exploitative of the others.

    Put another way: no one should be obligated to participate in society, but then society should likewise have no obligations to the non-participants.

    • Skunk [any]@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Nature compells us to work for food anyway, that’s not exploitation and coercion, that’s just survival.

      Not all of us ahem bourgeoisie ahem

      The construct of society is predicated on the idea of “from each… to each…”

      of course, however what makes a societies differ is exactly what gets filled in to the “…”

      “from each slave to each slavemaster” -> slavery
      “from each serf to each lord” -> feudalism
      “from each worker to each owner” -> capitalism
      “from each person (according to their ability) to each person (according to their need)” -> socialism 😄