• DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Nuclear causes the fewest deaths out of all available energy sources, except solar, which is a tiny bit lower in that regard. Both wind and hydro have a higher death toll, with wind being just slightly above nuclear, and hydro being a lot higher (about 40x more deaths).

    https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/death-rates-from-energy-production-per-twh

    Usually I wouldn’t cite this source, but in this case their data matches other, more trustworthy ones, and is the first that shows up in search engines.

    • bountygiver [any]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It also have a bit of due to regulations making sure people who work on nuclear are way more compentent, while other green energy infrastructure can be built by rando workers like your roads and such. Kind of similar to how air travels are the safest only because of strict protocols and requirements to work on it.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is probably true when it comes to wind, but deaths from hydro is all about dams breaking.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Almost all deaths from both nuclear and hydro are caused by major accidents like Chernobyl or the Banqiao Dam.

          Which makes you think, considering coal power plants still cause infinitely more deaths - and that’s just standard operation.

          • mirshafie@europe.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Exactly. Also the deaths from coal are not contained to a single spot.

            Just the radioactive damage from coal under normal operation is worse than the radioactive damage from nuclear disasters.