FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWhy Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agentswww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up1340arrow-down119
arrow-up1321arrow-down1external-linkWhy Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agentswww.wired.comFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square194fedilink
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months ago half the time Who said all the time? The problem is most people can’t tell which half it’s fucking up. An unreliable tool isn’t useful
minus-squareFranconian_Nomad@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agoHmm. They fuck up 50 percent of the time? I not only doubt that, I know that this is wrong. No offense. Do you actively use LMMs?
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoNo. Because they fuck up so often. Why would I keep using a broken tool?
minus-squareFranconian_Nomad@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 months agoGotcha. You‘re one of those guys talking out of their arse.
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoNope. Just experienced enough to know when the tool is wrong, so I understand it’s a fuck up.
Who said all the time? The problem is most people can’t tell which half it’s fucking up. An unreliable tool isn’t useful
Hmm. They fuck up 50 percent of the time? I not only doubt that, I know that this is wrong. No offense. Do you actively use LMMs?
No. Because they fuck up so often.
Why would I keep using a broken tool?
Gotcha. You‘re one of those guys talking out of their arse.
Nope. Just experienced enough to know when the tool is wrong, so I understand it’s a fuck up.