There is though. High profile events cause high volumes of 911 calls. If AI can be used correctly, perhaps even with Geo data, callers likely calling about the same event 400 others are calling about at the same time can get an informational “we know, thank you. But press 1 to talk to a human if still needed”. This allows the humans to help Grandpa having a heart attack across town instead of speed answering dozens of calls about the same fender Bender on the interstate during rush hour.
Not everyone in an emergency has the ability to press 1. Implementing something which requires them to do so sacrifices those people, and I find that unacceptable.
There’s a simple answer, and that’s engaging sufficient human staff to handle emergencies.
The more I think about this idea of AI use by New Orleans the more sense it makes. As long as it’s a human asking the emergency protocol questions and dispatching first responders, falling back to tech for filtering overwhelming call volume during large incidents is a good idea.
Also, human resources cost money and 911 centers already struggle financially. People don’t want more taxes, and that’s how more staff and equipment is funded
On top of that, there’s a nationwide 911 staffing crisis.
It’s not an easy solution, and ai is a tool that can help.
There is though. High profile events cause high volumes of 911 calls. If AI can be used correctly, perhaps even with Geo data, callers likely calling about the same event 400 others are calling about at the same time can get an informational “we know, thank you. But press 1 to talk to a human if still needed”. This allows the humans to help Grandpa having a heart attack across town instead of speed answering dozens of calls about the same fender Bender on the interstate during rush hour.
Just my opinion. Thanks for listening.
Not everyone in an emergency has the ability to press 1. Implementing something which requires them to do so sacrifices those people, and I find that unacceptable.
There’s a simple answer, and that’s engaging sufficient human staff to handle emergencies.
More info for you showing it may not be so simple
https://www.iaedjournal.org/combating-the-911-staffing-crisis
https://www.911.gov/newsletters/issue-14/survey-more-than-half-of-911-centers-face-staffing-crisis/
https://www.reddit.com/r/911dispatchers/comments/1iqdzn0/emergency_staffing_crisis/
https://www.nena.org/news/669810/Survey-Reveals-Urgent-Challenges-in-9-1-1-Centers-Amid-Staffing-Shortages--Technological-Gaps.htm
And on and on and on.
The more I think about this idea of AI use by New Orleans the more sense it makes. As long as it’s a human asking the emergency protocol questions and dispatching first responders, falling back to tech for filtering overwhelming call volume during large incidents is a good idea.
Also, human resources cost money and 911 centers already struggle financially. People don’t want more taxes, and that’s how more staff and equipment is funded
On top of that, there’s a nationwide 911 staffing crisis.
It’s not an easy solution, and ai is a tool that can help.
I hear you, but imagine the alternative where it takes many tries dialing 911 to reach a human or you never do because the system is overloaded
Trust me when I tell you that is exactly what is happening today. If you can dial 911 you can press 1, hopefully.