It’s not even this that is the problem. We look at it in the retrospect and we still don’t really know. However at the height of biggest war ever things do look very different. It’s not even dichotomy, if you look at the time, even the most unjustified relocation, that is the Koreans, does not look that unnecessary considering that it was 1937, year before Japan really invaded USSR. And while Koreans were a nation opressed by Japan, collaboration there was also high (and during WW2 over 7 million Koreans were mobilised by Japan, though most of them were used as forced labour and not soldiers).
Also the definition of relocation as genocide is made up specifically to bash USSR since it equals expulsions with coordinated relocation, including the post war relocations which (again in retrospect) definitely saved eastern Europe from becoming Yugoslavia 2.0 just worse in 90’s.
It’s not even this that is the problem. We look at it in the retrospect and we still don’t really know. However at the height of biggest war ever things do look very different. It’s not even dichotomy, if you look at the time, even the most unjustified relocation, that is the Koreans, does not look that unnecessary considering that it was 1937, year before Japan really invaded USSR. And while Koreans were a nation opressed by Japan, collaboration there was also high (and during WW2 over 7 million Koreans were mobilised by Japan, though most of them were used as forced labour and not soldiers).
Also the definition of relocation as genocide is made up specifically to bash USSR since it equals expulsions with coordinated relocation, including the post war relocations which (again in retrospect) definitely saved eastern Europe from becoming Yugoslavia 2.0 just worse in 90’s.