FWIW, what might have been but probably never really, etc.

  • billmason@startrek.websiteOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Not oligarchy, state disinformation and war mongering?

    My main reaction overall to the reveal was this iteration of Paramount ownership would have cancelled something that delved into these things as fast as it did the rest of the Trek slate.

    Also, it’s slightly boggling that the fans who wanted this were hyped for Captain Seven (I think it’s fair to say), and the premise was going to be…nah, let’s do a Worf/Alexander/Klingon politics story? Who was asking for more Alexander stories?

    • SiliconAvatar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Well, Seven would still be the captain, and it would probably be wise to have the main story not be about her, but how she leads the crew through it. I would even say, an adult Alexander who has lived a life on his own — could be interesting if done right. Which is a big if.

      But with the junior LaForge and the secret Picard heir already on the crew… It all starts to reek of those franchises where generation after generation of one or two bloodlines are magically hurtled to power. Not at all what I think of with Star Trek. But I suppose that should be expected from a show called “legacy”.

      And I’ve already said my part on Terry Matalas’ ideas for a geopolitical metaphor…

    • ValueSubtracted@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Who was asking for more Alexander stories?

      If there’s one thing I’m pretty confident Terry Matalas wants to do, it’s bang his old action figures together.