a headline catches interest and defines a pattern.
Groyper white-nationalist Def Noodles physically attacks an brown Christian after losing a debate
the above defines too much
Groyper
white-nationalist
Def Noodles
attacks
brown
Christian
lost debate
most of that is just superfluous.
A groyper is a white-nationalist so saying it twice is redundant.
nobody that is going to be reading this knows or cares who def noodles is.
the fact that the guest is brown or Christian is needless to say and can be covered in the video/article.
the lost debate is the cause of the video.
cause: lost debate
effect: attacks
who: groyper vs guest
if you wanted to spruce it up you could probably call the guest a zionist from what others have claimed. I don’t know who he is well enough to claim that, so I simply used guest.
Why?
a headline catches interest and defines a pattern.
the above defines too much
most of that is just superfluous.
A groyper is a white-nationalist so saying it twice is redundant.
nobody that is going to be reading this knows or cares who def noodles is.
the fact that the guest is brown or Christian is needless to say and can be covered in the video/article.
the lost debate is the cause of the video.
cause: lost debate
effect: attacks
who: groyper vs guest
if you wanted to spruce it up you could probably call the guest a zionist from what others have claimed. I don’t know who he is well enough to claim that, so I simply used guest.