Last year, China generated 834 terawatt-hours of solar power.

Which is more than the G7 countries generated, and more than the US and EU combined. In fact the only country group that generates more solar power than China is the OECD, all 38 countries of it.

Data: @ember-energy.org

Source: https://bsky.app/profile/nathanielbullard.com/post/3lsbbsg6ohk2j

  • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Coal is unreliable

    How? I would’ve said coal is very reliable, it worked for over a hundred years.

    • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Unreliable may have been a poor choice of words.
      You can’t move coal around with pipes or wires. Someone needs to drive trucks full of coal to a power plant.

      The pollution from coal tends to have a lot of externalities that drag on the economy. Lost work days, faster equipment degradation, etc.

      They use coal but they have practical reasons to want to reduce reliance on coal.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Trucks? If you move coal for a power plant using trucks you’re going to need a lot of trucks, you use trains or ships instead, or just build the power plant next to the mine and use conveyor belts.

        • nednobbins@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Trains and ships are part of the logistics chain but trucks are definitely part of it. They have a big advantage of not needing train stations or ports, as long as you have a decent road. Some of the larger strip mining operations fill a truck per minute.