Another poster said the commentor is talking about a youtuber named gabi belle, who afaik posts ZERO sexual content and even if she did that still wouldnt make her an object for your personal sexual satisfaction.
The idea that anyone at all has any real power over how other people look at them beyond how they present themselves being suggestive of a particular lens is absurd.
The commenter said she posted that she wanted her score on the foot rating site to be higher, which seems like pretty clear consent to objectify her feet.
Hate how you’re so upvoted because not only is your information third or fourth hand depending on perspective, you also outright believe it and knit your idea of consent around such weak thread.
She’s joking, if anything this is a defeatist joke around the fact that she is nearly powerless when it cones to being objectified and sexualized without her consent, and the dark humor on display is very on brand. So the screenshotted comment, presumably a viewer of hers, should be familiar with her style of comedy and her struggles with being objectified and her likeness being misused.
So that comment is by someone who either does the exact thing to her that she doesn’t want, or they are genuinely so porn pilled that they genuinely haven’t ever picked up on what she’s talking about and are only there to objectify and sexualize her.
I would not have bothered to comment unless I knew enough about her, her content and the thoughts she shared surrounding these things, I suggest we all adopt this approach in the future.
Uh, I posted her original tweet, literally first hand information.
You can argue that it’s a joke, but when you literally go online and say “Please rate my feet higher”, you can’t be surprised when people take you at face value and do the thing you specifically asked for.
When you make a post in a public space, you can’t expect everyone to know your lore. For example, my wife is a brown immigrant and I’ll make racist jokes to her about her ethnicity, which she laughs at because she knows I’m not racist and I’m punching at racism itself, not her race. But if I post those same jokes in public, people will assume I’m racist because they don’t have the context my wife does.
If she made the joke in the middle of a stream with context, you’d have a point. But she didn’t, she made a standalone tweet, and even said “Please”. That reads as pretty unambiguous consent.
Another poster said the commentor is talking about a youtuber named gabi belle, who afaik posts ZERO sexual content and even if she did that still wouldnt make her an object for your personal sexual satisfaction.
Zero sexual content with the name like ‘Gabi Belle’? I’ve jerked off already, no need for anything extra.
No you don’t understand she’s a woman showing her face therefore she’s a sex object
Anyone inherently is a sex object
I wish I was a sex object
You’re not just a sex object, you’re a sex bomb!
Oooh so that’s why I’m on the no-fly list
Nah. You wish you were.
You heard 'im Whittaker family. Back to the pile.
Only if they want to be
The idea that anyone at all has any real power over how other people look at them beyond how they present themselves being suggestive of a particular lens is absurd.
You, and apparently some others, completely misread my comment…
In this case I don’t think it’s her face that they’re interested in her showing…
The commenter said she posted that she wanted her score on the foot rating site to be higher, which seems like pretty clear consent to objectify her feet.
Hate how you’re so upvoted because not only is your information third or fourth hand depending on perspective, you also outright believe it and knit your idea of consent around such weak thread.
She’s joking, if anything this is a defeatist joke around the fact that she is nearly powerless when it cones to being objectified and sexualized without her consent, and the dark humor on display is very on brand. So the screenshotted comment, presumably a viewer of hers, should be familiar with her style of comedy and her struggles with being objectified and her likeness being misused.
So that comment is by someone who either does the exact thing to her that she doesn’t want, or they are genuinely so porn pilled that they genuinely haven’t ever picked up on what she’s talking about and are only there to objectify and sexualize her.
I would not have bothered to comment unless I knew enough about her, her content and the thoughts she shared surrounding these things, I suggest we all adopt this approach in the future.
Uh, I posted her original tweet, literally first hand information.
You can argue that it’s a joke, but when you literally go online and say “Please rate my feet higher”, you can’t be surprised when people take you at face value and do the thing you specifically asked for.
When you make a post in a public space, you can’t expect everyone to know your lore. For example, my wife is a brown immigrant and I’ll make racist jokes to her about her ethnicity, which she laughs at because she knows I’m not racist and I’m punching at racism itself, not her race. But if I post those same jokes in public, people will assume I’m racist because they don’t have the context my wife does.
If she made the joke in the middle of a stream with context, you’d have a point. But she didn’t, she made a standalone tweet, and even said “Please”. That reads as pretty unambiguous consent.
Having watched Gabi, it was almost certainly a pretty obvious joke. Not surprising she blurred them, people are disgusting.
Eh, not sure “obvious joke” describes it.
You gotta be socially inept to think there’s no irony there.
Maybe there is, maybe there isn’t. It’s absolutely not obvious though.
Seconded. That kind of humor is 100% on-brand for her.