• howrar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    it’s okay for the meaning of the post title to also be part of the discussion.

    Isn’t that what this entire thread is?

    accuse them of intentionally using malicious misleading tactics

    I never implied intent. Or rather, never intended to. If there’s a particular comment I made that did, do let me know. My communication skills are perpetual work in progress.

    • 3abas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      And that is indeed using misinformation tactics.

      This is where you went from “I’m not sure if you meant it the way I initiated l interpreted it” to “I was right all along, you’re intentionally spreading misinformation”.

          • howrar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            That I did. I wasn’t aware that the comment implied any intent. And that’s on me, which is the entire point in trying to communicate. Even if I didn’t intend to imply malice, I still did, and it’s my responsibility as the speaker to communicate better so that the reader actually interprets the text as I meant it to be interpreted.