• ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Phase it out” implies they created it in the first place.

    What they meant was “Forcibly stop our customers from using a plugin from a 3rd party developer”

    Literally none of Microsoft or Google’s god damn business and a reasonable country would heavily fine them for breaking consumer protection laws.

    The part that would piss me off the most about blocking Ublock isn’t even the ads, I use Ublock to hide annoying non-ad elements on things, like blocking the AI on Google searches.

    • Le_Wokisme [they/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      The part that would piss me off the most about blocking Ublock isn’t even the ads, I use Ublock to hide annoying non-ad elements on things, like blocking the AI on Google searches.

      and any banner images i don’t like

  • tombruzzo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    If Firefox ever drops ublock it will be time to abandon browsers altogether and just read the magazines in those weekly torrent dumps. Set up search in your torrenting software and you don’t even need a browser

    • PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      We are long overdue to declare web bankruptcy. This whole paradigm of turning the browser into an operating system unto itself and allowing every random webpage to run scripts on your machine which fingerprint and track you is probably the greatest mistake in the history of computing. This architectural choice is the cornerstone of contemporary surveillance capitalism.

    • dead [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Mozilla fundamentally can’t block ublock because Firefox is FOSS. All the other mainstream browsers are proprietary. Firefox is licensed under MPL.

      Some extensions get removed from the Firefox extension site, such as addons that promote copyright infringement, because Mozilla can’t legally promote that stuff. You can however still install extensions from files.

      Even if the main Firefox browser executable from Mozilla were to block ublock extension, then people could legally fork the Firefox code to make their own browser.

          • ClimateStalin [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Yeah hence “supposed to be”

            I’m only semi-tech-literate, what is this manifest 3 thing and why does it kill Ublock? And if chromium is open, shouldn’t forks be able to modify whatever manifest 3 is to restore the abilities Ublock needs?

            • Taster_Of_Treats [none/use name]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              I don’t know all the details but I believe uBlock Origin relies on very long lists of servers that serve ads and declines to download from them, and manifest v3 limits the length of those lists so that they have to pick and choose which ones. Hence the uBlock origin lite, the lists are shorter.

  • KssioAug@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Is this news to anyone? Also, if you put Edge or whatever Chromium browsers in a category other than Chromium, then Firefox is not the only one since all Gecko browsers also support uBlock Origin (Waterfox, Librewolf, Zen, Floorp and whatever).

      • 9to5 [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        No disrespect to anyone but a metric fuckton of people have little to no tech knowledge and no desire to change that either.

          • 9to5 [she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I mean, I get it for some people but this is a case where, at least I think it depends. Like, I dont begrudge my old grandma for not getting computers… she barely handles her phone.

            With that said, I do agree that at least some modicum of tech knowledge is simply advantageous for your own success in a world dominated by technology.

            Like, Im on Linux and replace my own PC parts. I dont think Im particularly techadept but I know some of the very basics and how to troubleshoot. Im just aware that a lot of folks don’t.

            • DasRav [any, any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              18 hours ago

              My parents manage to use it regularly even though I put Firefox as their standard browser in everything. They will then complain about the ads on the internet.

              Literally once a month this happens.