• joe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I read the article and don’t see what you’re seeing. Can you point out the “false pretenses”. It seems the order was placed via a site that intentionally allows anonymous purchases.

    As a sidebar:

    a bookseller suspected that an order they received for 1,000 books on Biblio, a marketplace where buyers can remain anonymous, was for an AI company. So to get to the bottom of the mystery, they agreed to place an Apple AirTag between the pages of one of the volumes.

    Emphasis mine.

    That seems sketchy to me. I’m not confident it’s illegal, but I’m guessing a website that intentionally allows anonymous purchases isn’t going to take kindly to a vendor putting a tracking device in an order.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Oh no. Won’t somebody think of the billionaire whose monopoly that got exposed by some independent journalists who couldn’t be bought or bribed. How tragic.

      If Amazon is behaving ethically, they don’t need to hide what they’re doing.

      • joe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Hindsight makes people come to very foolish conclusions.

        Hint: what if it didn’t turn out to be Amazon?

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          404 media was already thorough in its previous research before actually tracking a book order. Despite your insinuation, there was no foolishness.

          But if we follow your billionaire defense to its logical conclusion, they should not have bothered verifying their leads, and left the space billionaire alone.