• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Machine learning/data science stuff.

    Local LLMs is half of it.

    But that aside, I found myself working with huge files that swapped like crazy on my 32GB of RAM, or were completely infeasible to work with. Janky local experiments I wouldn’t want to run on a cloud instance billed by the minute.

    128GB has been a godsend, but I could completely fill 192GB and still swap some if I had it.

    But I found there are happy side effects to having so much disk cache, too. For instance, game modding/tinkering has sped up immensely over 32GB. So has hashing for transfers, or other scenarios where it’s useful to already have a file cached in RAM.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Fair, I guess I’d also want some ram if I did not have access to a compute cluster.

      But to be fair, for what I do I don’t really think you can fit that much ram on a consumer motherboard.

      In machine learning I don’t generally find memory to be the bottleneck, as long as the GPU can handle it.

      But sure, opening huge files can be big trouble.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I can rent cloud stuff, but it’s just not worth it for casual/experimental use.

        Like keeping Deepseek V4 loaded and hitting it rarely, but I want it to be in my control… it’s just easier to do it locally.

        Or experiments I launch like 30 times before it works. I’d waste hours moving all my stuff to a cloud instance, configuring it, tinkering with the experiment to get it to launch; the thing would be idle the vast majority of the time. And yeah, I know I can containerize stuff, but some projects I can’t even test without a sizable memory pool.