• Null User Object@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Stop. Nobody should need to explain to you the difference between wearables and something you hold in your hand in these scenarios.

    • joe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I know the difference: you’re used to everyone having a phone with a camera. Depending on your age, you may have never known a world without smartphones.

      They’re just as easily used to record people without their knowledge as anything else.

      Reminds me of a Douglas Adams quote:

      I’ve come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies:

      1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary and is just a natural part of the way the world works.
      2. Anything that’s invented between when you’re fifteen and thirty-five is new and exciting and revolutionary and you can probably get a career in it.
      3. Anything invented after you’re thirty-five is against the natural order of things.
      • Airfried@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yet it’s perv glasses that normalize this, not phones. You don’t see people recording you with a phone while buying groceries. But they will film you with their perv glasses. All the time. There are clear differences and you’re being ignorant to them.

        • joe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          6 hours ago

          You don’t see people recording you with a phone while buying groceries.

          Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. Notably, phones don’t have a blinking light to tell you they’re recording.

          And I feel like I should mention that you are almost certainly being recorded while buying groceries.

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I remember when it was rude to take out your phone at spaces where people may want privacy like gay bars, and if you did take it out you visibly kept your finger over the camera. Nowadays only specific sensitive types of places have such rules and it has to be explicitly a rule that’s enforced.

            • joe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I remember when smartphones were new, there was talk of mandating by law that they made a noise when a picture was taken, to prevent being able to take pictures surreptitiously.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. Notably, phones don’t have a blinking light to tell you they’re recording.

            Yeah but the person has to point it towards you. If they’re doing it, the default assumption is that they’re filming.

            • joe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Notably, you don’t have to be looking directly at a person to record them with a phone, as opposed to wearing a camera on your face.

      • False@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I remember people not having cameras. Is pretty obvious when people are recording or taking pictures with a phone