• Solventbubbles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Unfortunately most people are intimidated and wary of Linux because “some of my programs might not work”

    Average people aren’t going to learn a new system because the whole “devil you know” thing.

    Simply, the majority of people would rather stick with MS than install a new OS.

    • Willie169@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If containers, VMs, and dual-boot are banned in the workspace I kinda feel the fear of things not work is legit. When I’m forced to code on a Windows computer without WSL at university’s Programming course in electrical engineering department. Everything I’m used to, bash, cat, cd, ls, nvim, sed, grep, …, simply don’t exist. And I end up find it easier to code in the small text box of the site they provide than any of the slow, non-Vim mode, IDEs.

    • horus_son_of_isis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Firstly, I use linux for self hosting, and have a love-hate relationship for any other purpose. I’ve been trying to make the full transition since about 2009(?) and always end up back on the spyware-riddled Microswamp ad-delivery system.

      I’m going to get downvoted for saying this, but if Linux could make hardware tasks as easy as Microsoft, namely printing, Windows would be a thing of the past.

      I could put Mint on my 72 y.o.mom’s computer and she probably wouldn’t notice the difference until she had to do something dealing with hardware (connect a camera, or god forbid, print something). inb4 just use cups - My mom doesn’t gasf about dependencies, chown, and chasing terminal errors for 6 hours to print an agenda for the ladies’ church meeting and then have it break itself the next day. This is why it fails. Linux purists who don’t care that people don’t have time for CLI will disagree, and that is precisely what keeps things in the current state.

      • greybeard@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Obviously I don’t know your setup, but Linux is far easier for printing in most cases. The drivers are built in, and just work. No third party driver packages full of spyware and ink ads necessary.

        Hardware support, in general, has always been a struggle for Linux, but in the last few years, two things have happened to tip the scale:

        1. Technology kinda stopped advancing. Products are, more often then not, a rehash of last years model with no major changes. This means if Linux gets support for last year’s device, it’ll probably work with this years with minor to no changes.
        2. Growing Linux popularity has increased the profile enough that companies are at least trying a little to support Linux, even if it is mostly just making sure Linux developers have documentation on the device.
        3. And secret number 3, the tools and systems for reverse engineering USB devices have gotten better and more understood.