• draco_aeneus@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 day ago

      What really seals it is the ‘angry’ version, which is just the same message again but with different formatting. No human would label that as “the angry version” without the inclusion of at least one “fucking”.

          • Dremor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            You can be angry and still be polite. On even insult othe without looking like you do. But subtilty isn’t Lemmy forte.

          • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I honestly think the styling is the main reason it feels AI.

            because the sentences are too short, they’re a style I sort of writes at times. Just sort of. LLMs tends to output longer sentences, rather than the two-three words. Then dot. That’s a rare one for LLM

            However it’s not an anti AI site, so they might have vibe styled it and probably had a LLM help with some of the wording. However I think a human did vet and rewrite parts of it.

      • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Em dashes being associated with AI is a disservice to them; in many cases they’re a far more suitable use of punctuation in interrupting a sentence than parentheses.

        In this instance, however, the em dashes between the first and second parts of sentences would be better replaced with semicolons than commas, in my opinion.

        • Vogi@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Yea, if it would have been only the em dashes, I would not have shared it but it was also committed by Claude which heightens the possibility of the text also being generated I think.

          • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            They’re definitely more likely to be used by AI than by the average person, but I think that’s in large part because people aren’t generally taught to use them, along with their absence from keyboards.

            Since keyboards have two minus sign keys, I have a script running on my computer to automatically replace one of their inputs with an em dash.

        • pidgey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I use dashes constantly (way more than I should I’m sure) and always have - and I am in my mid 50s. Low key worried that folks will think I’m using AI so now I’m self conscious about them.

    • Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I mean, to be fair, if I have to extend something to meet a word minimum I naturally ramble like a bot just filling it up with pointless junk.

      Why I did so much better in “business writing” at uni, they rarely gave me minimums, only the need for usable content that met the criteria for a proper answer.

      • graynk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, but “Here’s what you just did” and the “What you sent instead says:” and especially the “The whole thing. Yes, even the bullets. Especially the bullets.”