An aspiration

  • Soot [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Is consuming four beers at a work party lunch automatically an alcohol problem? In which case half of Europe are addicts. I think super context dependent.

    • Sleepless One@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      According to the NIAAA, if he had one more beer at lunch he would be a heavy drinker.

      NIAAA defines heavy drinking as follows:

      • For men, consuming five or more drinks on any day or 15 or more per week
      • For women, consuming four or more on any day or eight or more drinks per week
      • Soot [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Well no, by their definition, if he consumed five or more drinks he wouldn’t be a heavy drinker, he would have heavily drank. There is a meaningful distinction. The next sentence, as you’ll have seen, is :

        SAMHSA defines heavy alcohol use as binge drinking on five or more days in the past month.

        And at that point, I totally agree. If someone is drinking more than this person, and on a regular basis, they would certainly seem to have a problem.

        They are definitely not saying if you drink five beers one day you are now an alcoholic.

      • that’s affirming. i had an ex that would house the better part of a sixer of 9-12% ABV cans every evening. i am not really one to scrutinize, but i noticed it after a week and thought, “isn’t that kind of a lot?” very costly $$, but also like damn. we were the same age, but i had 100 lbs on them, and that would have given me the spins. i dismissed it at the time as most of my life ive been a “lightweight” with limited tolerance and i quit altogether 7-8 years ago.

        to see something fairly objective that isn’t distorted by an experienced drinker’s ability to appear functional is eye opening.