• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    It’s pretty simple, I explained how and why Russia invaded Ukraine, and NATO’s role. You never responded to that, and instead said Russia invaded Ukraine because it can only “bully” non-NATO countries. There’s no materialism in your explanation, no underlying economic reasoning, just pure “Russia invaded Ukraine because Russians are evil” nonsense.

    You’ve also been vaguely suggesting that western imperialism is a good thing, so that chauvanism tracks. Russia in your eyes is a “bullying country” and NATO in your eyes is an “anti-bully alliance,” which holds no actual water.

    • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I was just saying that NATO countries haven’t been attacked by Russia whereas non-NATO countries have, so it might be that the membership has maybe something to do with it.

      I thought it was a simple point but you’ve since brought up genetics and good and evil into it, which honestly surprises me since I don’t know where you got any of that

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        It has something to do with the calculus behind the final decision, but not why it happened in the first place. You’re free to reread my comments and JAQ off.

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m not sure what the math is behind it but if it works it works ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯