Ive often seen individuals on the left talking about how billionares shouldnt exist etc., but when probed on how that could be accomplished the answer is usually just taxes or guillotines. I dont think either is great.

What if instead, corporations were made to be unable to be sold or owned. Initially theyre made to default to popular election for their board, and after that they can set up a charter or adopt a standard one, ratified by majority vote of their employees.

Bank collapse would probably follow, how could that be remedied? Maybe match the banks invalidated stocks with bonds?

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I still think capitalism is a useful tool. But by are we letting it use us rather than the other way around?

    Government was arguably created to establish a market, needed for any economic system to work. You need consistent legal structure, money, a way to do business.

    But our failure is government getting owned by the market rather than shaping it for the good of their constituents. Let capitalism be our tool in a market that factors in externalities, fairness and that rewards work.combine that with a progressive tax system like what we claim, and things are looking up, with what seems like minor changes.

    • why does the market fail to account for environmental destruction in the cost of doing business?
    • why is the market based on a legal structure that exploit individuals?
    • why do the richest people have the lowest effective tax rate?