The relevant section is blunt. “The Software is licensed to you, not sold,” the EULA states. “You are granted a limited, non-exclusive, non-transferable, and personal license to play or use the Software for your private, non-commercial use on the system or device it was intended for.”

The terms also restrict renting, modifying, or obtaining games through unauthorised means. Nothing in there is new, technically. Sony’s EULA has always said this. The timing is what makes it land differently right now.

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    If it wasn’t, then buying a single copy would legally allow you to sell an infinite amount of copies.

    Because that’s what actually owning software means.

    This. Is. A. FUCKING. Lie.

    If I buy and own a physical copy of a book. I am not then entitled to set up a printing press and sell my own word-for-word copies of said book. Same applies to ownership of digital goods.

    If I go to GOG and buy a DRM free game (aka I would then own that copy) I still wouldn’t have the legal right to distribute copies to other people.

    That’s because copyright laws exist, and they apply to both situations I described. Shame on you for mindlessly repeating industry lies.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Never ever owned software. Even physical disks has something like buying this gives you a license to use this software. Great examples is movies. It gave you a license for private viewing only. Showing a movie you had a copy if to a group of people technically broke that.