• mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    That should be the answer, but thanks to Disney extending copyright to basically a century, the answer is no.

    You would think everyone clutching pearls about “rare books” would be on-board to relax that nonsense, so a corporation scanning every book could just post their scan. You would really think.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        … yes, the entire idea of copyright is that owning a copy is distinct from the right to sell more copies.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Right, but we’re not talking about owning, we’re talking about selling. The AI companies are buying these books. Which means someone is selling them.

          • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Are you confused by the concept of a used book store?

            They’re buying old books. Books that are no longer in print. These specific copies were produced legitimately, by the rightsholders, but new copies are no longer being made. Whether the publisher could reprint them might be legally or logistically complicated. More often, nobody cares.