• saltesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That was my first thought. Just tell them it’s for AI training. Tech companies will back it because they have to set that precedence.

  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    When did scraping become illegal and can I C&D these fucking AI companies that keep scraping and crashing my servers? Can I sue them for the thousands of dollars in labor and mitigation practices that became necessary because of their agents?

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Oh cool that’s actually good to know. I assume xAI lawyers will just shred them?

        (No seriously though, I thought this was a formal process heh, TIL)

        • terabyterex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 hours ago

          they do pay lawyers to draw it up but its like a threat. saying stop or we will sue. you can sue for anything. its civil court.

          if something is illegal, the government will be the one taking action.

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    From Nitter Matrix chat (quote formatted by me for Markdown parsing):

    basically, it demands that I:

    1. Permanently take down nitter.net and the GitHub repository, and delete all “X Data” in both
    2. Stop all use of the “Twitter” and “X” marks
    3. Cease all access to X data, including copies
    4. Delete all X account credentials and session tokens 5. Confirm compliance in writing within three business days

    The claims asserted are breach of X’s Terms of Service, Developer Agreement and Developer Policy; the Texas Harmful Access by Computer Act; and the Lanham Act. It threatens litigation against me personally. X states it has also sent notice to GitHub and to my domain registrar.

  • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Invidious and Redlib are next in Big Tech’s crosshairs as Google and Reddit are surely going to be empowered by this.

    Also, should the alternative platforms be worried about getting targeted for simply being competition too? Like, what’s stopping Musk from maliciously patenting microblogging and using that to go after Mastodon, for instance?

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Invidious is different in that they are not scraping the content, it’s just a frontend. Redlib and Nitter are both scraping and rehosting the content.

      • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 minutes ago

        What does Nitter even scrape? They probably only have limited storage. How can they store the whole Twitter posts and comments?

  • EmilieEasie@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    That’s very funny in an ironic way but I relied on Xcancel a lot to credit artists for work still on twitter for whatever reason