…except the local bird population.

  • bryophile@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Then there is no animal friendly way to keep cats without damage to the environment

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Oh so I guess if we cannot be perfect we should just stop caring. Blocking people who cannot be communicated with on here requires way too much effort and yet I persist…

      Like what the fuck is the point in pretending people need to know that nothing is perfect? Everyone obviously already gets that

      You’re implying something and it’s not good. Pretend otherwise all you want, I won’t see your messages

      • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Everyone obviously already gets that

        The first comment of this chain literally says:

        easily prevent all the damage to the local environment by just keeping your cat inside.

        So no, mybe it’s not obvious for everyone and maybe even obvious things need to be said occasionally for oblivious folks.

      • bryophile@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I’m implying cats have an effect on the climate because they eat meat. Not telling anyone not to have cats. I’m not sneakily implying anything else. I’m also not saying anything remotely controversial.

        • Natanael@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I get that there’s a difference with farmed meat and all, but you may as well argue natural wild predators are bad for the environment

          • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            That’s honestly an awful comparison. Wild predators don’t consume more than the environment can sustain, domestic cats represent either an artificial demand for farmed meat, which is bad for the environment, or they hunt themselves which is awful for the environment as well as they’re an invasive species everywhere and already the cause of dozens of extinctions.

            • Natanael@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Wild predators don’t consume more than the environment can sustain

              Sometimes they do

              Wild animals aren’t less taxing on the environment per se, they’re just differently taxing. Long living ecosystems are likely to be closer to balance. But never perfectly balanced.

              Domestic cats are just cats same as the wild ones, but in different numbers and locations

              For example, people like to talk about beavers as good for the environment. Sometimes they are, sometimes they aren’t!

              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r1wwtGgnzg4

          • bryophile@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            The difference between farmed and wild meat is crucial so no I may not as well argue that.

            • Smif_N_Lenin@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Leaving cats to find their own game instead of feeding them farmed meat is significantly worse for the local population (of birds in particular)