…except the local bird population.

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    their food has a significant impact on the environment

    What is anyone supposed to do with that information? Ie what is your point?

    • bryophile@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The point is keeping them inside doesn’t prevent damage to the environment, as a reply to what is said above. Is that not how this works?

      • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well fed cats allowed to roam still stalk and kill prey, it’s both instinct and play. Keeping them inside (or under control/on a leash) does prevent damage to the environment.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        But it does prevent huge amounts of environmental damage which can be helped, while we cannot help that cats require food. The only thing we could do about that is farm chickens for them or something.

        • DrunkenDuckling@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          We absolutely could help by not fucking spreading an invasive predator to every corner of this globe just because we find them cute. That’s morally reprehensible considering how dangerous cats are to local fauna:

          https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.1602480113

          “Introduced rodents and cats are major agents of extinction, collectively being listed as causal factors in 44% of modern bird, mammal, and reptile species extinctions.”