Many countries include ‘Democratic’ or ‘People’s’ in their names, even though they are not democratic and do not serve their people. Examples: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea Lao People’s Democratic Republic People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria Democratic Republic of the Congo And German Democratic Republic (East Side) in 1949–1990. None of these states are democratic, power and wealth are concentrated in the hands of a small ruling elite. Who are they fooling with these names?

  • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Boy wait until you find out the “Patriot Act” was actually about the government spying on you. It’s like politics 101 to give things names that aren’t at all related, but sound good.

    • notSys@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And what does it have to do with the subject of the post? How does it help the OP?

      • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        The subject of the post is "why do authoritarian states have words like ‘democratic’ or ‘people’s’ when they are not actually democratic or for people? Yes? Would you agree with that?

        Politics 101 is giving something a name that does not relate to the actual political thing you are doing. Naming a party, passing a bill, etc. The patriot act was an example i had off the top of my head.

        Thought the connection was incredibly clear but I guess not.